April 12, 2017 by Alison Tunley
Get a Free Quote
In his book The Signal and the Noise, Nate Silver talks about the proliferation of information following the invention and history of the printing press and the potential for misinformation and errors. One example he picks out is a… Read More
This blog post, the language of the marathon, is shamelessly influenced by your blogger’s obsession with running!
April is the month when Londoners and Bostonians turn out in their droves for two of the finest city marathons. And this year I will be attempting to run both, a total of 52.4 miles with just six days in between. Looking for inspiration I delved a little into the etymology and origins of this feat of athletic endurance.
The story goes that in 490 BC the Greek soldier Pheidippides ran from Marathon to Athens to deliver news of military victory against the Persians, whereupon he collapsed and dropped dead of exhaustion. In honour of his achievement, the modern distance running event takes its name from the site of the military battle: “Marathon”, which is itself derived from the Greek word for “fennel” which grew in abundance in the fields around.
No doubt there is a fair bit of artistic licence in this original marathon legend, but what is true is that the Greek army in those days used so-called hemerodromoi or ‘all-day running couriers’ to ferry messages back and forth. Some suggest that Pheidippides’ name itself means “to spare the horse” (from pheido “thrift” and hippos “horse”) – a reference to the fact that runners could outperform horses on this tricky terrain. It is also possible that Pheidippides may, in fact, have achieved a far greater feat than a mere 25 mile trot from Marathon to Athens. Fifth century historian Herodotus reports that, prior to the Battle of Marathon, Pheidippides was sent to Sparta to ask for assistance. He is said to have completed the run of around 153 miles in two days before running back to Marathon bringing mixed news. Yes the Spartans would help, but not for another 6 days as superstition meant they had to wait for a full moon before going into battle!
We have a linguist to thank for the invention of the modern marathon. French philologist Michel Bréal (often regarded as the founder of modern semantics) was a friend of Pierre de Coubertin who instigated the nineteenth century revival of the Olympic Games. Bréal was perhaps inspired by Robert Browning’s poem and its romanticised retelling of the Pheidippides story:
He flung down his shield
Ran like fire once more: and the space ‘twixt the fennel-field
And Athens was stubble again
At any rate, Bréal suggested the inclusion of a 25 mile running event in the programme for the first modern Olympics in 1896. The race would be named in French “marathon” after the Greek “Μαραθών”.
Language usage also reveals something about the history of this event. Just take a look at Google’s Ngram graph plotting usage of the word “marathon” (the very essence of the language of the marathon) between the late 19th century and today. A steady increase in use can be seen from the first Olympic marathon up to the 1960s at which point the trajectory tilts steeply upwards through the running boom of the 1970s and 80s before plateauing out somewhat at the millennium.
If this linguistic analysis suggests that marathon running may have reached its peak – what could be next? Well, some say that hard-core runners have already moved on, setting their sights in increasing numbers on the “ultramarathon”: any race which is longer than 26.2 miles in length. And, some would argue, rather closer in definition to Pheidippides’ original undertaking. Indeed the modern day “Spartathlon” is a 153 mile race held between Athens and Sparta in his honour. I’m not sure whether that’s inspiring or horrifying.
Taylor Wessing LLP
We are very pleased with the services provided by Rosetta Translations. They always send very prompt responses, transparent prices and deliver their work product at the highest standards.
Jackie Brook, Sr Product Manager
Thank you very much for your prompt and efficient service.
Maximus Crushing and Screening
I have translated multiple projects with Rosetta now and I cannot emphasise how great the service they provide is; quality, turnaround time and pricing is the best I have found yet. The qualities of translations we receive are of the highest standard and communication from the start of a project to the end is consistent.
For a company looking into translations, I would highly recommend Rosetta as first pick, as the support and service they provide is first class.
Get a Free Quote
© 2023 All Rights Reserved
Rosetta Translation, 133 Whitechapel High St, London E1 7QA · 0207 248 2905